Now is amplified (strengthened) is maintained theme of the state popular subsidiary mortgage. If the state is going to subsidy real estates of banking businesses, it is possible safely to name such mortgage state. About it also there will be a speech. Though it is possible to make the clause at once. Expensive long-term subsidy of all population at the expense of the population to goods not will result. (Clarification: the social mortgage is intended not for all Russians, therefore social subsidiary mortgage - separate theme).
AFP = RFP * CHA
CHA - cost of housing accommodation
�nd what will be in 2-3 years? In prize will be only very first in long-term turn behind the subsidies.
And can there will be no even very first in a prize, because the subsidy are long-term the surtaxes, which
will be to be going at the expense of long-term decrease (reduction) the salaries and pensions. And with what
You see yourselves and close in this turn?
Was not going to concern the social mortgage, but it is necessary to remind, that first some years by first
in turns will be the clients of the social mortgage. All subsequent will be in a deepest loss. I.e. long-term
expensive subsidy only the population at the expense of the population to goods not will result.
%% | The Prices | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
year | 50 | 70 | 80 | 90 | 100 | 120 | 150 | 200 | 300 |
0 | - | - | - | - | 10 | 12 | 15 | 20 | 30 |
3 | - | - | - | - | 11,72 | 14,07 | 17,58 | 23,45 | 35,17 |
6 | - | - | - | - | 13,59 | 16,3 | 20,38 | 27,17 | 40,76 |
9 | - | - | - | - | 15,58 | 18,7 | 23,37 | 31,16 | 46,75 |
12 | 8,85 | 12,39 | 14,16 | 15,93 | 17,7 | 21,24 | 26,55 | 35,4 | 53,1 |
15 | 9,96 | 13,95 | 15,94 | 17,93 | 19,93 | - | - | - | - |
18 | 11,13 | 15,58 | 17,8 | 20,03 | 22,25 | - | - | - | - |
21 | 12,33 | 17,27 | 19,73 | 22,2 | 24,67 | - | - | - | - |
24 | 13,58 | 19,01 | 21,73 | 24,44 | 27,16 | - | - | - | - |
The quantity of money should correspond to quantity of the goods. The discrepancy can result in a hyperinflation and default. I.e. from what have left to that and we shall come. Only to reduce the prices it is more difficult, than to increase. It is the market the seller. To us the buyer's market is necessary.
Now we shall pass on a logic chain:
Important theme. Without tax reform will not be essential growth economy and standard of living, neither new housing accommodation, nor decision of housing problem.
The Parasitic Inflationary Taxes (PIT) "eat" enclosed in production the capitals: constant and turnaround, salary and pension. This theme is more important than the mortgage, since from anything is received anything.
An Example of a PIT for a Working capital (WC)
- Inf - 0 %: the Prices, the Cost Price (CP) and rate of a CR do not vary. The businessman
Somebody on 100 Millions Roubles (mr) has acquired components. They were not necessary, and in one
year he has reseiled them till a CP for the same 100 mrs. Profit or Added Cost (AC) - 0. The taxes - 0.
Losses - PIT - 0. Is possible at necessities to acquire new components.
- Inf - 100 %:The Prices, CP and rate of a CR for one year are doubled. In the beginning of year 100
mCRs = 100 mrs. In one year 100 mCRs = 200 mrs. Somebody reseils furnishing on a new CP, since the prices were
doubled, for 200 mrs, receives imaginary inflationary profit (or imaginary inflationary AC) - 100 mrs, pay
the taxes (from the imaginary profit?!) - 50 % - 50 mrs. He still has 150 mrs or 75 mCRs, on which it is
possible to acquire only 75% of components. Real losses - 25% real buying power of a WC. It also is a PIT for
a WC.
The indicated example of a PIT is equal half of ifference between a new real CP and old, indicated in tax
declarations. I.e. at a zero Inf of a PIT is not present in general, since. The CP does not vary. With growth
of a Inf the burden of a PIT grows also.
The Losses from a PIT somebody will transfer on the salary of the hired workers. If he will cover the business, the workers and their families, in general, will stay without a piece of bread.
From the indicated examples it is visible, that at a zero Inf of a PIT is not present in general. With growth of a Inf the burden of a PIT grows also.
Tax reform
The essence of tax reform - legislative fixing in the tax declaration of the Cost Price in a CR, that will
allow to get rid of a PIT and to make production favourable and fast growing. It:
- New jobs and decrease(reduction) of unemployment
- Essential growth of real wages and pensions
- Additional tax receipts at fast growing economy
- Decrease (reduction) of expenditures on public account on the unemployment benefits
- Etc.
The mortgage begins with comparison of variants. Here 4 comparative tables with percentage by the rates -
0; 1;... 18; 19%/years and with terms of crediting - 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 27 and 30 years:
1 - Monthly Fixed Payments (MFP)
2 - Factors of Credit Status (FCS). With the help of a FCS it is possible to expect as the much as possible
allowable sums real estates
3 - Sum of a MFP for all term of crediting
4 - Sum of percents (interests) for all term of crediting